Hi all.
I would like to ask for comments on the approval of *Wp/wlx*. It has been
active since Aug 2024, and it has been 4 months that 3 or more editors have
been active[1]. There are about 1343 pages including templates.
This language saw a drop in activity in April and May, but random sampling
of pages gave me a generally good impression of the content, and it had
been showing decent activity levels before that, so I don't think it's a
major problem.
Most important core messages have already been translated(100%)[2]. The
request has already been submitted[3].
I would like to ask for your opinion on the approval of this, thank you for
your consideration.
[1]
https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/wlx&wiki=in…
[2] https://codelookup.toolforge.org/wlx
[3]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Wali
Kind regards,
Sotiale
Hi,
The activity in the Luba-Kasai Wikipedia Incubator (code lua) has been
pretty impressive, and although I cannot read the language, the quality of
the article appears to be good, too. They tend to be somewhat short, but
seem good enough to me.
(A comment about the language name: It is also known as Luba-Lulua, Cilubà,
and Tshilubà.)
Links:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Luba-K…https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/lua
--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
While being taught about how to use the new dashboard, Jhs and I noticed
that https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/nyn is very active (the
language name is written in many different variants).
It doesn't even have a Meta request, which is fun! But it can be approved,
as it fulfills the activity criteria and has the most-used messages. It
only needs verification of the content.