Hello Language Committee,
I am writing today to share a proposal for an experiment addressing a new
approach to onboarding a language wiki.
Since December 2023, we have had conversations with 35 relevant
stakeholders, including three members from the Language Committee (Tochi,
Mf-Warburg, and Jon), to develop recommendations addressing a few current
challenges with the incubation journey. As a result of these discussions,
several recommendations emerged, which are documented here
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Future_of_Language_Incubation/Recommendations
which can be broadly grouped into the following two key areas:
1.
Streamlining technical infrastructure
2.
Exploring social pathways
For the 2024-25 annual planned work of the Wikimedia Foundation and as part
of the Content Growth objective (WE2/Knowledge Equity)
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2024-2025/…>,
the Language and Product Localization team with guidance from the Language
Committee members, identified a recommendation that addresses some of the
difficulties of content creation in the Incubator due to technical
limitations of the platform. To address this, we would like to try the
following:
Identify a set of requests (maximum 5) from the list in the new wiki
approval backlog which have been either already approved by the Language
Committee and, prioritize their creation on the production infrastructure
so that they do not have to continue writing content on the incubator wiki.
At the end of a stipulated period we evaluate progress of these prioritized
wikis compared to other test projects (approved or otherwise) still in the
incubator.
Please see the detailed proposal
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wpwimVyhLOJVMnIos4cAAquTglbjdKfiHcdUmHR…>,
including selection and inclusion criteria, timeline, implementation plan,
and more information. We also presented this proposal at Wikimania 2024:
https://youtu.be/BbGrkYK8FEk?t=20299
After consultations with several other teams inside the WMF relevant to
this area of work we believe this is a feasible starting point towards
better content creation experiences for newer communities. To move onwards
we would like to reach a shared agreement with the Language Committee and
start off the pilot. Based on the criteria listed in the email, we would
like to include as part of the experiment following list of wikis (also see
attached screenshot):
-
Mapudungun
-
Southern Ndebele
-
Obolo
-
Tai Nüa
-
Pannonian Rusyn
We would like to kick off this experiment as early as possible and would
really appreciate hearing your suggestions on changes or additions to the
selection criteria and initial list of wikis by August 24th.
Cheers,
Srishti
*Srishti Sethi*
Senior Developer Advocate
Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
[image: screenshot_from_2024-08-07_19-41-25.png]
Hallo,
There are these two open requests:
1. hoj:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Hadauti
2. raj:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Rajast…
raj is a macro language code, and hoj is one of the languages that belong
to it.
I don't know these languages, and I'm not sure what to do about them.
I sent talk page messages to people who contributed to them, asking whether
they actually plan to contribute to them more, and whether the current
incubator articles in them look related.
Until we get any substantial replies, I recommend marking the two requests
as "Waiting".
--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
Hi.
I would like to ask for comments on the approval of *Wb/min*. It has been
active since Sep 2024, and it has been 7 months that 3 or more editors have
been active[1]. There are about 1455 pages including templates.
Most important core messages have already been translated(85.71%)[2]. This
is odd since their Wikipedia has already been approved(wikt: was approved;
2019), but I don't think it will hinder this approval as this is an issue
we can ask them to resolve. The request has already been submitted[3].
This language already has wp:, wikt:, so there is no need for an additional
verification process.
I would like to ask for your opinion on the approval of this, thank you for
your consideration.
[1]
https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wb/min&wiki=in…
[2] https://codelookup.toolforge.org/min
[3]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikibooks_Minang…
Best regards,
Sotiale
Hi.
I would like to ask for comments on the approval of *Wp/lua*. It has been
active since Jan 2024, and it has been 6 months that 3 or more editors have
been active[1]. There are about 1758 pages including templates.
Most important core messages have already been translated(100%)[2]. The
request has already been submitted[3].
This is a bit different from the name SIL(Luba-Lulua) and their
proposal(Luba-Kasai) and the name they use on Wikimedia
incubator(Luba-Lulua). This email follows the name their proposal
uses(their main contributor is the same user who made the proposal). This
project needs to go through a verification process because there are no
other open projects.
I would like to ask for your opinion on the approval of this, thank you for
your consideration.
[1]
https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/lua&wiki=in…
[2] https://codelookup.toolforge.org/lua
[3]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Luba-K…
Best regards,
Sotiale
Hi.
I would like to ask for comments on the approval of *madwikisource*. It has
been active since July 2024, and it has been 7 months that 3 or more
editors have been active[1]. There are about *834 *pages including
templates.
Most important core messages have already been translated(100%)[2]. The
request has already been submitted[3]. This language already has Wikipedia
and Wiktionary, so no additional verification process is needed unless
there are special circumstances.
The most recent project for this language is Wiktionary, which was created
in September 2024, so there is no problem of multiple projects being
created in such a short period of time to approve this project.
You might think that the content itself is less than other projects, but I
don't have any particular opinion on this matter.
I would like to ask for your opinion on the approval of this, thank you for
your consideration.
[1]
https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/?title=Bh%C3%A2sa_Madhur%C3%A2&cat=1…
[2] https://codelookup.toolforge.org/mad
[3]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Madur…
Best regards,
Sotiale