Ack!  Didn't notice you CC'd the list.  o/  hi huggle folks!

Re. API no worries.  Definitely nice-to-have for your work.  I'll be hacking on a general solution in the meantime.  I'll swing by with a spec once I have one worked out to make sure that, once we get there, you'll be able to make use of it in Huggle if it makes sense.  

-Aaron

On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Petr Bena <benapetr@gmail.com> wrote:

Yes, that would be nice to have thing.

Right now there is something I call HAN (huggle antivandalism network)
which is a very simple IRC based service that huggle clients and other
software can use to communicate with each other -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Huggle/HAN

this is what we use now to propagate scores that are computed by
ClueBot to all huggle clients and of course we use it to make it
possible for huggle clients communicate with each other :) (there is
even a chat window that can be used by huggle users to talk to each
other within a project scope)

On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Aaron Halfaker

<aaron.halfaker@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Petr,
>
> I'll post to the huggle list next time.  For an example score from STiki's
> API, see
>
>  http://armstrong.cis.upenn.edu/stiki_api.php?style=score&rid=346523549
>
>
> For more info, see the readme:
> http://armstrong.cis.upenn.edu/stiki_api_readme.txt
>
> I'll be writing up a proposal for a general edit scoring service API. It
> would be nice if that could include a "Huggle" score along side others. I'll
> be digging through your code to see what it would take to extract such a
> score for a common API.
>
> -Aaron
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Petr Bena <benapetr@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It's always a better idea to post to huggle list instead of me only.
>> For example, now I was on vacation for few weeks and couldn't answer
>> you :-)
>>
>> Yes, it is possible to USE IT, but right now huggle support for non
>> english wikis which are maintained either by some people who don't
>> understand huggle or people who do understand huggle but not the
>> language, isn't very good, so even scoring isn't very good. The very
>> algorithm is pretty simple, you can see it at
>>
>> https://github.com/huggle/huggle3-qt-lx/blob/master/huggle/wikiedit.cpp#L92
>> however, resulting score isn't shared in any way. Only possible way to
>> accomplish this would be to run a huggle based bot that would send the
>> scores somewhere. This is actually possible (I am working on head less
>> huggle that could run as a system service instead of GUI) but it's not
>> up yet...
>>
>> In addition I don't understand how STiki shares the scores? How is that?
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Aaron Halfaker
>> <aaron.halfaker@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Petr,
>> >
>> > I'm the maintainer of Snuggle[1].  Snuggle uses vandalism scores from
>> > STiki[2] on enwiki to generate desirability scores for newcomers.  I'd
>> > like
>> > to extend Snuggle to non-English wikis, but there's no STiki outside
>> > enwiki.
>> > I noticed that Huggle exists outside enwiki *and* it performs a triage
>> > of
>> > edits by the probability that they are vandalism.
>> >
>> > Is there a way that I could make use of Huggle's scoring system in
>> > Snuggle?
>> >
>> > 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Snuggle
>> > 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:STiki
>> >
>> > -Aaron
>> >
>> >
>
>