Hello Artur and others,
> * For each illustration, there should be a version with numbered labels and
> a blank version, on top of versions with English or other localised labels.
> The numbered version allows easy reuse on small Wikipedias (without
> graphists), the blank version allows interactive diagrams using ImageMap for
> instance.
Disagree. It's trivial to remove labels from labeled image. Going
further labeled (with texts) images are much less usable than
numbered. It's cause very low resolution of computer displays - text
labels eat a lot of screen resolution but don't provide any
information to image itself. It's why some people vote oppose on FPC -
usable width of image on Wikipedia is up to maybe 600px, and average
is about 300, so if image has 50% of width used for empty margins/text
labels we loose 50% of effective resolution. Of caurse it doesn't
affect printing where we have at least 10 larger resolution for images
:) but it worth remembering that text labels are just sexi, but not
good at all.
> * Each illustration should be translated in as many languages as possible.
> This part can be done by volunteers, but the image has to be advertised to
> them.
Hope you mean description of image (numbered labels in description page).