From: Olaf.Janssen(a)KB.nl To: glamtools(a)lists.wikimedia.org Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 12:45:30 +0000 Subject: Re: [Glamtools] VisualFileChange: Good tool for post processing Good to hear you find the tool useful as well! Fae pointed me to another useful tool for post-upload refinement of categories: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Gadget-Cat-a-lot Best , Olaf -----Original Message----- From: glamtools-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:glamtools-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of glamtools-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org Sent: vrijdag 24 juli 2015 14:02 To: glamtools(a)lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Glamtools Digest, Vol 28, Issue 5 Send Glamtools mailing list submissions to glamtools(a)lists.wikimedia.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to glamtools-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org You can reach the person managing the list at glamtools-owner(a)lists.wikimedia.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Glamtools digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Be like mushrooms: 10 months WIR at BEIC (European Library Info&Cult) (Federico Leva (Nemo)) 2. Re: VisualFileChange: Good tool for post processing GW-toolset batch uploads (Hans Muller) 3. Mass Upload (Jason J. Evans) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:31:36 +0200 From: "Federico Leva (Nemo)" &lt;nemowiki(a)gmail.com&gt; To: cultural-partners list &lt;cultural-partners(a)wikimedia.ch&gt;ch>, "Wikimedia & GLAM collaboration [Public]" &lt;glam(a)lists.wikimedia.org&gt;rg>, Wikimedia & Libraries &lt;libraries(a)lists.wikimedia.org&gt; Cc: Conversations revolving around the development of GLAM Digital Tools &lt;Glamtools(a)lists.wikimedia.org&gt;rg>, Open Access discussions &lt;openaccess(a)lists.wikimedia.org&gt;rg>, Announce Mailing List &lt;WikimediaAnnounce-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org&gt; Subject: [Glamtools] Be like mushrooms: 10 months WIR at BEIC (European Library Info&Cult) Message-ID: &lt;55B0DEA8.30107(a)gmail.com&gt; Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Hello, you may remember the WMIT WIR at BEIC; if not, see links in English. :) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GLAM/BEIC Last week, the 10 months collaboration came to an end; I published a lenghty report/case study in Italian. TL;DR: free software developed, 10 BEIC staff contributing, a thousand images uploaded, 6500 usages, 400 articles created, 4 millions accesses/month. https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progetto:GLAM/BEIC/2015-07 The partnership between WMIT and BEIC will actually continue, but I'll have a non-BEIC job at WMIT and a non-wiki job at BEIC. So I'll do little/no editing for BEIC; probably some planning, training, uploading and maybe coding. Maybe WMIT will keep providing BEIC a wiki editor and invoice for it, maybe not. I have some requests from you! I hope you can help. 1) Comments on the past months, e.g. based on the monthly updates or brutal numbers. 2) Suggestions on what is worth translating of the report. There are passages trying to push institutions to free software, open data, public domain, community consultation, involvement of staff. Someone liked my metaphor "be like mushroom, not sequoias". But maybe this is all covered better elsewhere already? 3) Recommendations on how to update https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedian_in_Residence . Should I still be listed there, or call the WIR done? Where to record the WMIT-BEIC partnership? 4) Lessons from other partnerships with institutions having an in-house wikimedian not doing wiki work. (Other than Sannita/Luca at ICCU...) Perhaps Scotland, Netherlands and Switzerland have more to say as AFAICT they are all moving towards a permanent team serving multiple institutions à la traveling WIR, like WMIT. Nemo P.s.: Sorry for cross-posting but I think it's better than many overlapping messages; if possible reply on each list to the parts relevant for that list and cc only me, not all the other lists. ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 16:51:28 +0200 From: "Hans Muller" &lt;j.m.muller(a)hccnet.nl&gt; To: "Conversations revolving around the development of GLAM Digital Tools" &lt;glamtools(a)lists.wikimedia.org&gt; Subject: Re: [Glamtools] VisualFileChange: Good tool for post processing GW-toolset batch uploads Message-ID: &lt;0e255ae6efb79d8b9ed1e8b8d97bb42e.squirrel(a)webmail.hccnet.nl&gt; Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 I concur. Just corrected a spelling error in 850 files! Welbedankt Olaf! Op Do, 23 juli, 2015 10:29 am schreef Jesse de Vos: ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:07:10 +0100 From: "Jason J. Evans" &lt;jason.evans(a)llgc.org.uk&gt; To: glamtools(a)lists.wikimedia.org Subject: [Glamtools] Mass Upload Message-ID: <101a-55b20000-251-2125ab00@68453761> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi everyone. I have just started uploading my first large batch of images to Commons using the toolset (abt 5000 low res images). The first 10 uploaded fine but for the last 30 minutes no more have uploaded. Is this a sign that there is a problem? or is it normal for there to be gaps in the upload? Thanks Jason -- Jason Evans Wicipediwr Preswyl / Wikipedian in Residence Llyfrgell Genedlaethol Cymru / National Library of Wales jason.evans(a)llgc.org.uk Ffon/Tel: +44 (0)1970 632405 ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Glamtools mailing list Glamtools(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools End of Glamtools Digest, Vol 28, Issue 5 **************************************** _______________________________________________ Glamtools mailing list Glamtools(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools