On 29 Sep 2015 10:17, "Lizzy Jongma" <L.Jongma(a)rijksmuseum.nl> wrote:
Thank you! That was indeed the solution I was thinking of & good to hear
others
are doing it this way too.
This is a fairly standard practice - and
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Guide_to_batch_uploading#Naming
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Glamtools [mailto:glamtools-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] Namens
Estermann
Beat
Verzonden: dinsdag 29 september 2015 11:16
Aan: Conversations revolving around the development of GLAM Digital Tools
<glamtools(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Onderwerp: Re: [Glamtools] upload from Rijksmuseum has
stalled?
Hi Lizzy,
In Switzerland, we often just add the inventory number at the end of the
file
name.
This is particularly handy if you have similar items
with the same or
similar names; otherwise it takes ages to match the items on
Commons with
the items in your database later on (or when checking against log files ;-).
Cheers,
Beat
-----Original Message-----
From: Glamtools [mailto:glamtools-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf
Of Lizzy
Jongma
Sent: Dienstag, 29. September 2015 11:11
To: bawolff+wn(a)gmail.com; Conversations revolving around the development
of GLAM
Digital Tools
Subject: Re: [Glamtools] upload from Rijksmuseum has
stalled?
Thank you for helping me with the log files!!! That is really helpful.
There are
quite a few duplicate titles: some are actually not duplicate but
just have the same title. We need to come up with a new and better strategy
for naming files! And indeed: some were uploaded before (for instance by me
:-) We also encountered some character set issues: I cannot explain where
that came from but I will research it a bit more.
This has been a huge learning experience for me! So thank you for helping
me.
Next upload will hopefully go a lot smoother (we also
have some rough
edges to deal with on our side :-))
> Best
> Lizzy
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Glamtools [mailto:glamtools-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] Namens
bawolff
Verzonden: zondag 27 september 2015 16:47
Aan: Conversations revolving around the development of GLAM Digital Tools
<glamtools(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Onderwerp: Re: [Glamtools] upload from Rijksmuseum has
stalled?
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Lizzy Jongma <L.Jongma(a)rijksmuseum.nl>
wrote:
> Dear all,
> I restarted my upload on september 22nd: I
started uploading approx
2600 images with works of art depicting birds. Until 25th
of september the
images were ingested into Wikimedia Commons (they were slowly dripping in)
but over the last two days no new images are ingested. Does anyone knows
what went wrong/why the upload stopped (again) and how I can restart my job?
> I also have difficulties estimating how many images and which images
were ingested: which log can I check? I can’t find the relevant log to see
what was uploaded or what problems were reported etc.
Thank you very much for your help.
best wishes
Lizzy Jongma
The logs for you in particular are at
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=gwto…
If you want the list in xml or json format, you can do
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=logevents&…
. See the api docs for details. In particular leaction
can be used to
filter by success/failure, and you need to use lecontinue parameter
to get
the next page of results.
There are several entries that appear to be "skipped" due to the image
existing already in commons. The records numbers are in the 2800's (The
record numbers will skip around a bit, but should very roughly go from low
to high in order), so if you only have about 2600 images, I would guess
that a the tool went through all the images
It seems like that perhaps the xml file has the same filename for several
images.
For example
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Inhoudsopgave.jpeg is marked as
being replaced by a second image after your initial upload, and in the log,
it looks like record 2815 was going to replace that image a third time,
except someone had edited that page in the meantime (
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Inhoudsopgave.jpeg&…
> ), so gwtoolset failed instead of silently overwriting
> I also notice several of the templates and
file names have question marks
in them. If the ? is unintentional, that might represent issue with charset
conversions possibly.
> GWtoolset is still quite rough around the
edges, especially for showing
progress and explaining what happened in case of errors.
> --
> -Brian
>
_______________________________________________
> Glamtools mailing list
> Glamtools(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools
> _______________________________________________
> Glamtools mailing list
> Glamtools(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools
> _______________________________________________
> Glamtools mailing list
> Glamtools(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools
> _______________________________________________
> Glamtools mailing list
> Glamtools(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools