After the 3 file "preview" when running GWT on a fresh batch, it is possible to get the following odd looking error:
Internal error
[8292dd50] 2014-05-09 22:50:47: Fatal exception of type MWException
It looks disasterous, but actually (in my experience of two instances) indicates that GWT has encountered a attempt to re-upload the same file. This was a mistake in my xml where some initial records were duplicated (I am quite unsure why) and though the text page was overwritten, the image was only uploaded once (a good thing).
I don't think this is a bug, more a potential feature, particularly as the run then continues regardless. It would be nicer if the warning message was a bit less cryptic and did not look like the user had just crashed something badly (which "Fatal" normally indicates), but worth ensuring it is an exceptional case, potentially created by a poor xml source, and mentioned in the user guide.
Fae
I get this undue fatalistic message everytime i run GWT, even with fresh files (no overwriting), e.g., on 3 runs
Interne fout [d144d366] 2014-05-09 09:56:53: Fatal exception of type MWException Interne fout [dcd01c05] 2014-05-09 14:12:07: Fatal exception of type MWException Interne fout [1df76f4a] 2014-05-09 16:17:21: Fatal exception of type MWException
j.m.muller@hccnet.nl https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Hansmuller
Op Za, 10 mei, 2014 1:03 am schreef Fæ:
After the 3 file "preview" when running GWT on a fresh batch, it is possible to get the following odd looking error:
Internal error
[8292dd50] 2014-05-09 22:50:47: Fatal exception of type MWException
It looks disasterous, but actually (in my experience of two instances) indicates that GWT has encountered a attempt to re-upload the same file. This was a mistake in my xml where some initial records were duplicated (I am quite unsure why) and though the text page was overwritten, the image was only uploaded once (a good thing).
I don't think this is a bug, more a potential feature, particularly as the run then continues regardless. It would be nicer if the warning message was a bit less cryptic and did not look like the user had just crashed something badly (which "Fatal" normally indicates), but worth ensuring it is an exceptional case, potentially created by a poor xml source, and mentioned in the user guide.
Fae
faewik@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae
Glamtools mailing list Glamtools@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools
hi hans,
please report a bug on bugzilla, https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=MediaWiki%20extensions&...
include all of the steps necessary in order to reproduce the exception and indicate whether you are working on commons, commons-beta or a local wiki. also attach a copy of the metadata file and a link to the metadata mapping you're using.
with kind regards, dan
On May 13, 2014, at 18:20 , "Hans Muller" j.m.muller@hccnet.nl wrote:
I get this undue fatalistic message everytime i run GWT, even with fresh files (no overwriting), e.g., on 3 runs
Interne fout [d144d366] 2014-05-09 09:56:53: Fatal exception of type MWException Interne fout [dcd01c05] 2014-05-09 14:12:07: Fatal exception of type MWException Interne fout [1df76f4a] 2014-05-09 16:17:21: Fatal exception of type MWException
j.m.muller@hccnet.nl https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Hansmuller
Op Za, 10 mei, 2014 1:03 am schreef Fæ:
After the 3 file "preview" when running GWT on a fresh batch, it is possible to get the following odd looking error:
Internal error
[8292dd50] 2014-05-09 22:50:47: Fatal exception of type MWException
It looks disasterous, but actually (in my experience of two instances) indicates that GWT has encountered a attempt to re-upload the same file. This was a mistake in my xml where some initial records were duplicated (I am quite unsure why) and though the text page was overwritten, the image was only uploaded once (a good thing).
I don't think this is a bug, more a potential feature, particularly as the run then continues regardless. It would be nicer if the warning message was a bit less cryptic and did not look like the user had just crashed something badly (which "Fatal" normally indicates), but worth ensuring it is an exceptional case, potentially created by a poor xml source, and mentioned in the user guide.
Fae
faewik@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae
Glamtools mailing list Glamtools@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools
Glamtools mailing list Glamtools@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools