In an ideal world we could have a very conservative cut-off point and explicitly mark all things before this date as PD.
On 1 November 2012 13:46, Jonathan Gray <jonathan.gray@okfn.org> wrote:Is this a little risky? I'm all for making definitely-PD material
> Great - thanks Ole!
>
> So - from the point of view of prospective reusers - does this mean that
> e-books from DOD can be freely circulated and reused (as per
> opendefinition.org)? E.g. will scanned e-books or digital editions be made
> available with a legal waiver (Public Domain Mark / CC0) or equivalent "no
> rights reserved" legal disclaimers?
available, but I would assume that a good proportion of late-19th
century material is potentially still in copyright - the traditional
"safe" cutoff date is around 1870.
Unless it checks on a case-by-case basis, the KB would be tagging
material that is likely to still be in copyright, and while it's
probably safe for them to make it available, I don't know if we should
be encouraging using PD marks for possibly unfree material.
_______________________________________________
GLAM mailing list
GLAM@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam