Hi,
Would it be possible for the Wiki community, and in particular the new working group, to review the Cataloguing Code of Ethics 2021 https://sites.google.com/view/cataloging-ethics/home for use by the Wiki community?
The Code is a short (3 minute read) document, containing 10 short ethical statements which embody our collective responsibilities for creating, sharing, enriching and preserving the metadata that enables GLAM to expose and link collections. Key messages :
- Advocacy for our diverse user communities and for the value of cataloguing and metadata work - Collaborations are key - Jobs, education and training are crucial to create a robust workforce now and in the future - whatever that brings
The Cataloguing Ethics Steering Committee (we worked with the cataloguing and metadata community of practice to produce the Code) would be very happy to receive feedback from the Wiki community!
If you would like to read about the Codes' journey to date - 2021 was only the start - please read my article https://journals.cilip.org.uk/catalogue-and-index/article/view/676 published in the March issue of the online journal *Catalogue & Index.*
Thank you,
Jane Daniels (CESC UK Representative)
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, 07:44 , seehbe@gmail.com wrote:
Hello :)
*(survey incoming, apologies for the cross posting)* The global GLAM community is buzzing with activity! Across the world, there are meetings, campaigns, and projects all working to connect culture and heritage with Wikimedia initiatives.
Earlier this year, the GLOSS working group was formed to explore what kind of GLAM structure would best serve the community at this point, and what needs it should address. This working group builds on years of progress—especially the recent momentum—to further embed the GLAM community within our movement.
As mentioned during last week’s Global Call, the working group is now launching a needs assessment survey. Its purpose is to better understand the global community and, ultimately, help shape a new approach that supports GLAM activities around the world.
You can learn more about the GLOSS working group on the Meta page https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/GLOSS
Most importantly, if you have thoughts on what a centralized GLAM structure could look like—what needs it should meet, how it could support your work and contribute to the broader movement—please take 5 minutes to fill out the survey! *Deadline 12 May!*
*https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/GLOSS/Survey https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/GLOSS/Survey* And feel free to spread the word! Share it with your local chapter, other affiliates, or directly with fellow editors and volunteers.
The survey is already available in 4 languages. You can translate the survey meta page, and we will update the survey with your translation!
Best, GLOSS Working Group! _______________________________________________ GLAM mailing list -- glam@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to glam-leave@lists.wikimedia.org