With the title:
"Wikipedia's separate "American Female Novelists" category is way sexist."
Now all they are missing is the italics and valley girl voice over for *way sexist*.
It's nothing new, reporting wise, but, it's there, and...it's on the Cosmo website..and..GAHHH
http://www.cosmopolitan.com/celebrity/news/american-female-novelists-wiki
Sarah
On 05/01/2013 11:24 AM, Sarah Stierch wrote:
It's nothing new, reporting wise, but, it's there, and...it's on the Cosmo website..and..GAHHH
And, again, *wrong*: "who also happened to be a New York Times reporter"
GAHH!! More fail.
/me notes, don't read Cosmo before coffee, it does read better than usual. :)
-Sar
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Joseph Reagle joseph.2011@reagle.orgwrote:
On 05/01/2013 11:24 AM, Sarah Stierch wrote:
It's nothing new, reporting wise, but, it's there, and...it's on the Cosmo website..and..GAHHH
And, again, *wrong*: "who also happened to be a New York Times reporter"
______________________________**_________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/gendergaphttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Excellent! Now if only *one* of those readers could be enticed to edit Wikipedia because of this, if only to help categorize stuff, it would be great...
2013/5/1, Sarah Stierch sarah.stierch@gmail.com:
With the title:
"Wikipedia's separate "American Female Novelists" category is way sexist."
Now all they are missing is the italics and valley girl voice over for *way sexist*.
It's nothing new, reporting wise, but, it's there, and...it's on the Cosmo website..and..GAHHH
http://www.cosmopolitan.com/celebrity/news/american-female-novelists-wiki
Sarah
--
*Sarah Stierch* *Museumist, open culture advocate, and Wikimedian* *www.sarahstierch.com*