If 85% of Wikipedians were women I don't think there'd be quite as much porn on
there. ;-) I think there is also an age bias among Wikipedia contributors (according to
the research) and I think this does bias tone of the site along with gender. However
I'm more about getting women editing Wikipedia than pondering the sociological
questions (despite my degree in sociology!).
I guess it was the sociologist in me that asked the question about what the resource would
look like if the gender stats were reversed but there may well also be differences if the
average age of contributors were different.
regards
Rosie Williams
From: gendergap-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Gendergap Digest, Vol 1, Issue 96
To: gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:20:21 +0000
Send Gendergap mailing list submissions to
gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
gendergap-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
gendergap-owner(a)lists.wikimedia.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gendergap digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Women4Wikipedia (Oliver Keyes)
2. Re: PZ Myers takes on the gendergap (wrt atheism) (Sandra)
3. Re: PZ Myers takes on the gendergap (wrt atheism) (Ism Woonpton)
4. Re: Implications and solutions... Hardcore images essay -
HELP! (Carol Moore in DC)
5. Re: PZ Myers takes on the gendergap (wrt atheism) (Sandra)
6. A proposal (Oliver Keyes)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:13:54 +0000
From: Oliver Keyes <scire.facias(a)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Gendergap] Women4Wikipedia
To: Increasing female participation in Wikimedia projects
<gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Message-ID:
<AANLkTinHPkkRVhivV0qx1-tVBKJWOstOBryYFrE-wqpY(a)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
It depends. I don't think you can generalise and say that gender is the
distinction here; rather, it's a distinction of interests and norms. I
recommend
http://www.mindspillage.org/wiki/Women_on_Wikipedia as a good
read. " the culture is not biased against women, but rather biased toward
certain traits and against others--and that generally men are more likely to
be in the group whose characteristics are more accepted"; in other words, we
could have an identical culture if 85 percent of the editors were female,
they'd just be a very specific subset of women.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Collective Action <
collective_action(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
It has occurred to me to wonder what Wikipedia
would look like if 85% of
its editors were female?
regards
Rosie Williams
http://women4wikipedia
@collectiveact
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap