Agreed. On Christmas (or any other day), I am thankful this list helps move things forward in a variety of ways, for a variety of different people. I'm looking forward to hearing what Caroline would like to discuss, or Beria. But glad to know your thoughts on "pimp" and "madam" sarah, and to see a suggested path to improving wikipedia content. I do enjoy that stuff the most. Collabotative encyclopedia writing is fucking awesome, and I love how everybody goes about it a little differently.
Pete
On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Sarah Stierch <sarah.stierch@gmail.com> wrote:
...
> It's a shame that my posts have been so bothersome for the list, I never
> knew that I was only making things worse, or not helping at all.
I, for one, do not find your posts bothersome.
I find no problem with having one gender-neutral article for barbers
and hairdressers or for pimps and madams, but I do find it better to
have *two* good articles on the respective subjects.
Regards,
Ole
--
http://palnatoke.org * @palnatoke * +4522934588
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap