On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Kim Osman <kim.osman@qut.edu.au> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I edit Wikipedia a lot. I probably spend more time than I should editing
> Wikipedia. Can I ask where there is a prevalence of pornography on
> Wikipedia? I honestly can't think of a single time I have come across it
> when I wasn't directly looking for it. Misogny to a degree, yes.
> Discrimination against women's topics and topics outside the United States,
> youbetcha. But pornography? Maybe I just don't edit articles where
> pornography is very prevalent?
>
Hi Laura,
I totally agree with you - I have never come across anything remotely offensive in the course of editing or browsing. What I was trying to say is that rather than being a reason more females don't edit Wikipedia (and perhaps here my use of the word prevalence was wrong) the presence of certain types of pornography on Wikipedia contributes to the culture which results in the instances of misogny and discrimination you note. So I do see the editorial decisions made around the type of content Larry Sanger referenced as being part of a wider conversation about female participation.
Cheers, Kim
That, in a nutshell, was the point I was making.
Andreas