On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Sydney Poore <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:sydney.poore@gmail.com">sydney.poore@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">

<div id=":ou">Can you give an example of what you are considering when you want to give a sexually explicit image preference out of necessity.<br><br>For example if the only image uploaded of a United States State Park was a nude female laying on a blanket in tent and masturbating in the the state park, would you say that it should be included so we have an image of the State Park?<br>

<font color="#888888">
<br>Sydney<br><br></font></div></blockquote></div><br>I think it&#39;s valuable that we seem to have reached consensus that sexualized media is one factor in this whole effort to attract and retain women editors. <div><br>

</div><div>But rather than continuing a general discussion about what degree of sexual content is okay, how about we take what we&#39;ve discussed and add it to a list of issues that affect the gender gap? I just want to make sure we stay focused on welcoming women editors here, rather than on controversial content at large. <br clear="all">

<br>-- <br>Steven Walling<div>Fellow at Wikimedia Foundation</div><div><a href="http://wikimediafoundation.org" target="_blank">wikimediafoundation.org</a></div><br>
</div>