Lennart,

I love the name 'Editing cottage', that is very homey! :) I may steal that for relaxing events in the US!

On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Lennart Guldbrandsson <l_guldbrandsson@hotmail.com> wrote:
Two things about the name:

1) in Swedish we don't call them editathons, but "skrivstuga/skrivstugor" (editing cottage/editing cottages).

2) the suffix "athon" comes from Marathon, a long-distance run. Considering that this event is even longer than any normal editathon, it's arguably even more appropriate ;-) But I see your point.

Best wishes,

Lennart Guldbrandsson

070 - 207 80 05
http://www.elementx.se - arbete
Skriv som ett proffs - min senaste bok
http://www.mrchapel.wordpress.com - personlig blogg
Presentation

@aliasHannibal - på Twitter

"Tänk dig en värld där varje människa på den här planeten får fri tillgång till världens samlade kunskap. Det är vårt mål."
Jimmy Wales



Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 11:30:29 -0800
From: christinewmeyer@gmail.com
To: gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Gendergap] Regular editathons in Sweden about women and literature

I'm very interested in this kind of thing, so much so that I'd like to follow a similar model locally.  I'm not sure that I live in a large enough area to make it feasible, though.  However, I think that it's a good model to recruit and retain editors, especially women, who tend to like editing in community.  Wikimedia should pursue this.

As far as a name for regular editing sessions like this, it reminds me a club--a group of people who meet regularly to accomplish some kind of task, like a book club or Toastmasters.  How about something like, "Wikipedians Club".  I'm sure there's a more creative name than that.  And then we could have individual chapters with more creative names, based on topic or geography.

Christine
User:Figureskatingfan

On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Kerry Raymond <kerry.raymond@gmail.com> wrote:

The key comment is this: “We are also considering ways to get the people most interested in going to those editathons to also run them (empowering them, in effect).”

If edit-a-thons are to achieve scale, it’s necessary that once established, the group will continue under its own momentum. This frees up the original organisers (or new members who have “graduated” to become new organisers) to move on and establish similar groups.

 

Just an aside, I think we need a different term for this kind of regular edit session. Perhaps it’s just my own cultural baggage, but I associate the “-a-thon” as a big once-off event e.g.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Meetup/Canberra/2014-08-14-Wikibomb

 

rather than something smaller but more regular and ongoing. Maybe we should call it an editfika J

 

Kerry


_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap



--
Christine
____________________

_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap