While the picture could be described as somewhat pornographic, I'll
have to agree with previous participants in this email conversation. This
article IS porn-related, so a pornographic cartoon can be used to
illustrate it, per WP:NOTCENSORED.
From,
Emily
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Carol Moore DC <carolmooredc(a)verizon.net>wrote;wrote:
NO need to censor it. Just do a second one with
bushier eyebrows and a
goatee and put that up instead :-)
On 4/27/2012 1:50 PM, Béria Lima wrote:
Katrin, I hate to be captain obvious here, but: Do you know that "cun
shot" is a porn related term right? Only used in Porn related articles (see
related
articles<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Cum_shot>…
And that what is in the article isn't a picture, but a illustration?
I do agreed when people complained about the naked gardening article and
pic, because isn't a sex related article. But this IS a sex related
article, not only, this one is a PORN related article. Is not like someone
will fall there accidentally by looking for Jesus or Santa. Therefore, I
don't see the reason to censor the article.
____
*Béria Lima*
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap