Health professionals thinking about what belongs in an educational video might want to walk down the hall to the outpatient department and see what kind of films are being shown to family members while they wait.  Who knows, there might even be something out of copyright that can be made available to the public. If obstetrics is being described in terms of storks (what, no cabbage patch?) then pediatrics on Wikipedia is even more dismal. I wondered about this article on infant sleep training and why it is assigned to women's health project.  Does Wikipedia recognize no difference between gynecology and pediatrics? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Infant_sleep_training And then I realized there is no project for pediatrics. With the medicine project developing the offline Kiwix application that can be used by practitioners who treat refugees and populations in the developing world, this seems like a knowledge gap that has huge implications for maternal and infant health worldwide. 

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 10:34 PM, Risker <risker.wp@gmail.com> wrote:
Noting that the discussion has now closed with the video being removed. 

Risker/Anne

On 29 October 2017 at 14:50, Ryan Kaldari <rkaldari@wikimedia.org> wrote:
It would be nice to have some women weighing on this debate:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Abortion#RfC_regarding_video


_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap