Can someone look at this for me?
The Women's Equality Party is non-partisan. It is willing to work with ANY and ALL
OTHER PARTIES. It is a key fact about them as a party. I think removing it would breach
WP:INFOBOXPURPOSE "to summarize (and not supplant) key facts that appear in the
article". I've also offered multiple sources to demonstrate its
All the comments seem to be debating whether the party IS non-partisan, if a party CAN BE
non-partisan etc. and consensus building on that point.
The Women's Equality Party is not affiliated to any OTHER party, a key fact which is
made repeatedly clear in the article.
I think it needs an administrator to make a ruling on the Wikipedia POLICY POINTS that I
have made (no-one has taken me up on any of them in the discussion), rather than a
consensus based on the ding-dong over the concept of non-partisanship generally.
For me this is an attempt at censorship.
"We cannot suggest that WEP are a bunch of
head-bangers if they are willing to work with anyone, regardless of which side of the
political divide they come from."
"Let's take 'non-partisan' out of the
infobox, it makes the party sound too reasonable."