Can someone look at this for me?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Women%27s_Equality_Party#Proposal_to_rem…
The Women's Equality Party is non-partisan. It is willing to work with ANY and ALL
OTHER PARTIES. It is a key fact about them as a party. I think removing it would breach
WP:INFOBOXPURPOSE "to summarize (and not supplant) key facts that appear in the
article". I've also offered multiple sources to demonstrate its
non-partisanship.
All the comments seem to be debating whether the party IS non-partisan, if a party CAN BE
non-partisan etc. and consensus building on that point.
The Women's Equality Party is not affiliated to any OTHER party, a key fact which is
made repeatedly clear in the article.
I think it needs an administrator to make a ruling on the Wikipedia POLICY POINTS that I
have made (no-one has taken me up on any of them in the discussion), rather than a
consensus based on the ding-dong over the concept of non-partisanship generally.
For me this is an attempt at censorship.
"We cannot suggest that WEP are a bunch of
head-bangers if they are willing to work with anyone, regardless of which side of the
political divide they come from."
"Let's take 'non-partisan' out of the
infobox, it makes the party sound too reasonable."
Marie