Hey,<br><br>I&#39;m trying to get <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netball">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netball</a> to good article status and hopefully to featured article status.  The discussion is at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Netball/GA1">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Netball/GA1</a><br>
<br>The literature about netball when you start getting into media representation basically follows similar themes:  Because this is a women&#39;s sport, it doesn&#39;t get media coverage.  Because it is a non-Olympic sport, it gets ignored in a wider sporting history. Because it is a women&#39;s sport, it doesn&#39;t have the documented history.  It is a women&#39;s sport and should be celebrated as such, not being forced to conform to male models.<br>
<br>I&#39;m having issues with the Good Article review.  I&#39;ve never done this before and I&#39;m feeling a bit frustrated.  I can&#39;t figure out if I frustrated because:<br><br>* I think I&#39;m right and he&#39;s completely wrong; OR <br>
* the reviewer is not communicating clearly; OR <br>* the reviewer is treating this sport by standards that would be applied to men&#39;s sport that shouldn&#39;t be applied to women&#39;s sport; OR<br>* I&#39;ve never gone through this before and my expectations are incorrect.<br>
<br>Does anyone have any insight into this situation?  Or can anyone provide assistance in helping edit the article to help get it through the GA process?  I feel like I keep taking information out of the article and taking information out and I&#39;m not certain why we&#39;re constantly removing information from the article or how to get information that no matter how much searching I can&#39;t find.<br clear="all">
<br>Sincerely,<br>Laura Hale<br><br>-- <br>twitter: purplepopple<br>blog: <a href="http://ozziesport.com" target="_blank">ozziesport.com</a><br><br>