Don't be depress Sarah if female participation remains low. Even if Wikipedia was a perfect place without any bias, it would still be a project from the "real world" were lot of forces prevent women from editing : lower confidence in themselves, less free time, lower access to education.

We can't change the world, juste make our small environnement a little less unjust.

Caroline


2012/2/2 John Vandenberg <jayvdb@gmail.com>
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 11:05 AM, emijrp <emijrp@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2012/2/2 Sarah Stierch <sarah.stierch@gmail.com>
>>...
>> What else are people seeing in their chosen languages that might be
>> interesting? Anything surprising?
>>
>
> No. Only a few examples where women are 15-25% of edits some days but in
> small Wikipedias or sister projects. They are not representative.

I think (hope..) you might find a high female participate rate even if
you aggregate across all of the Wikisource projects.

--
John Vandenberg

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap