2. Regarding the edit-a-thons, you
said:
Actually, the male students didn't
trash the wiki women posters, but made and posted separate
"wiki dudes" posters of their own. The NewsRecord post said
that doing so didn't constitute a Title IX violation, yet.
I find it kind of disturbing that
male students would feel the need to react that way, by making
the wiki dudes posters. It is obvious that there is less
coverage of women in Wikipedia than of men, and that most
notable figures in American and European (in fact, global)
arts, history and science have been men, who have received
plenty of attention and biographical scholarship already!
The fact that the anonymous male
students went to the trouble of creating separate posters,
rather than vandalizing the existing wiki women posters,
indicates a level of forethought that is beyond mere impulse
trolling. If I were to wear my politically correct hat, I
would say that even members of the patriarchy realize and
acknowledge that there is more scholarship devoted to notable
men than notable women. The truly oppressive patriarchy would
believe that that is appropriate, and go about their business.
Do the wiki dudes guys truly believe that men are being
overshadowed and under-represented on Wikipedia and elsewhere,
I wonder? If so, that demonstrates a troubling lack of
awareness of reality, especially on a college campus.
I don't have any suggestions for
remedying the situation, nor am I condemning anyone's actions
e.g. for "making men feel marginalized"; I suspect that these
men are deliberately choosing to marginalize themselves. It is
just a remarkably peculiar reaction to wiki women
edit-a-thon's, and I hope we don't see more of it.
~Ellie Kesselman a.k.a FeralOink