On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Daniel and Elizabeth Case
<dancase@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>
>> Given this, I'm going to change how the moderation of this list is
>> handled a little bit moving forward.  Previously, there has been no
>> hands-on moderation of this list.
>
>
> Then how come I had two posts returned to me last week with the message:
>
> 5.x.0 - Message bounced by administrator
>
> They were arguably trivial and off-topic, so I accepted that decision. But
> now someone says that decision wasn't being made?
>
> If there are three moderators on this list, are all of them on the same page
> about what the moderation policy is or isn't? Will they be in the future?
>
> Daniel Case
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

I'll respond to other things shortly, but just got home and saw this
and wanted to get to it right away.

If your message was bounced, it's a bug with the listserv, and not one
of us.  Currently, there is absolutely no active moderation on this
list with the exception that messages sent by non-members are
screened, and sometimes, the auto-administration filters catch and
discard messages that have the list only as an implicit destination
(i.e., on the cc or bcc line.)  I am 100% positive about this - we
don't currently have the technical ability to screen posts from people
who aren't flagged +moderate, and I just checked and you are not and
haven't been flagged +moderate.

-----