I didn't find a men only list, but their list of powerful people looks close enough. (!)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:99of9/powerpeople

I'll leave the ratings until after Andrew re-rates them ;-), but already there's a male redlink at #36 most powerful - interesting gap.

Toby



On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Toby Hudson <tobyyy@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Absolutely!  Please do.
Yes, it was nice to see some FA and GAs in the mix.  Maybe we should compare a list of 100 most powerful men?
Toby


On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Andrew Gray <andrew.gray@dunelm.org.uk> wrote:
Stub tags are notoriously bad for this (I've just rerated half a dozen
of these; Toby, are you happy for me to update the list?)

On the other hand, we can take away a somewhat positive message from
this as well:

Two articles are FA and 6 are GA/equivalent. Across enwiki as a whole,
approximately 0.6% of articles are FA or GA class. So this subset of
articles is perhaps ten times better than the average...

Andrew.

On 16 June 2014 15:06, Risker <risker.wp@gmail.com> wrote:
> While I will agree that many of those articles could use significant
> improvement, I wouldn't take the assessments all that seriously; a lot of
> those articles have not been assessed in many years, despite intervening
> improvements.
>
> Risker
>
>
> On 16 June 2014 08:58, Toby Hudson <tobyyy@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I've just wikified this in my userspace if anyone wants to quickly check
>> out our articles on these women.  The good news is that we have an article
>> for each of them.  The bad news is that article quality is pretty grim if
>> these are truly the 100 most powerful women.
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:99of9/100powerwomen
>>
>> Toby/99of9
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Risker <risker.wp@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> This is a pretty impressive showing for someone just 4 weeks into the
>>> job: being named to the Forbes list of the 100 most powerful women:
>>> http://www.forbes.com/profile/lila-tretikov/
>>>
>>>
>>> Note that increasing diversity is, according to the brief article, a top
>>> priority.
>>>
>>> Risker/Anne
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gendergap mailing list
>>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gendergap mailing list
>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>



--
- Andrew Gray
  andrew.gray@dunelm.org.uk

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap