Yes, with the narrowing focus last year the community will need to take the lead. But from the meeting earlier this year it is clear that there definitely is talented people on staff at WMF who are more than willing to assist as their time permits. 

One of my recent ideas was to make a skill and experience list of WMF staff and community volunteers who want to time permitting work on the issue.

I'm going to be in San Francisco in November for the FDC meeting and plan to be in touch with WMF staff (including Sarah if she's available)  to figure out the best way to harness WMF staff energy and enthusiasm. We can start the list on site so the community members can add themselves. And at the diversity conference we can also gather people's skills.

I'll put something on meta tomorrow if no one else beats me to it.

Sydney

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 16, 2013, at 15:40, Sarah Stierch <sarah.stierch@gmail.com> wrote:

Nathan, you mentioned hiring a contractor or a staff member. I was a fellow last year, and I did all of that (speaking at conference, media outlets, generate initiatives, etc.) but the focus of WMF changed so my contract wasn't extended and a position was not formed. And some of us - Adrianne, Netha, myself - spend a large portion of our volunteer time devoted to this. I've stopped sending press coverage to this mailing list - but, we just got done with a big push for Ada Lovelace Day events, which was covered in everything from the BBC to Al Jazeera. I also speak at conferences, as do many other women on this list. We just don't post it here. 

WMF also pulled out of GLAM-Wiki work - so I see it as this: a chance for the community to lead the fight. And get money as needed from WMF as possible. That's what the GLAM-wiki community has done. And that's sort of what we have to do, and find specific people at WMF who can provide support as needed (Siko, Anasuya, me, etc) and find money as needed (WMF has it) and organize a bit more and get going. 

that's what WWC was formed for - a grass roots effort inspired by the women's movements of the past (and kinda present but not really these days), it's just been next to impossible to find people to take WWC to the next level (a user group). 

But, it's frustrating as hell, for me, at least. 

-Sarah


On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Nathan <nawrich@gmail.com> wrote:
It just seems like there is a lot of sort of low-hanging fruit
opportunity that the WMF could take advantage of if its serious about
really addressing the issue. Why not hire an activist of sorts to be
either a WMF employee or a grant funded contractor, who can develop
initiatives, speak at conferences and to media outlets, etc.? Generate
attention by participating in general tech communities and
tech/education conferences open to gender panels and speakers, solicit
reporting from news outlets and blogs, literally even place advertised
invitations to edit in venues with high visibility to women.

That's the thing, imho, that's been missing from this list and from
the WMF since the gender gap was identified as a serious (data
supported) problem: big picture activism and effort. One thing we've
realized as a community is that a lot of the small-bore outreach
efforts don't work well, so why not devote more resources to
large-bore recruitment? I'm not saying nothing has been done - indeed,
Sarah and Sue and others have put a ton of effort out, but it appears
to me that the WMF could be a lot more dedicated to it than it has
been.

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap



--
--
Sarah Stierch
Museumist, open culture advocate, and Wikimedian
www.sarahstierch.com
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap