+1 on SJ's comment, and I think Pete made some excellent points on the talk page. For instance: How would this affect the legal team's paid staff time if we place a big red button under each image? I have cc:ed Geoff since he may not be aware of the question.
But I would also like to say that this is very well worth checking out. This is the template that is suggested right now (feel free to edit):
"Tänk dig en värld där varje människa på den här planeten får fri tillgång till världens samlade kunskap. Det är vårt mål." Jimmy Wales
> Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 19:58:20 -0400 > From: email@example.com > To: firstname.lastname@example.org > Subject: Re: [Gendergap] [Commons] "Flag this image" prototype > > Interesting. Thanks for the heads-up! SJ > > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 4:29 AM, Erik Moeller <email@example.com> wrote: > > Sorry to those who are tired of the image/consent discussions, but > > just wanted to bring this to this list's attention as well. > > > > I'm tagging this thread with "[Commons]" and suggest others do the > > same in future to make it easier for people who do not want to discuss > > Commons or who feel inundated with the subject matter to filter these > > messages. Also, if you're using Google Mail, you can "mute" a thread > > (under the "More" options after you open the thread) and you won't see > > any future responses in your inbox -- other email clients have similar > > features. > > > > Quick notes about an interesting development: > > > > * User:Rillke on Commons has started prototyping a gadget that could > > be used to simplify reporting of various issues with images with a > > simple "Flag this image" workflow. This discussion is on the Commons > > Village Pump. > > > > I've brought that discussion to the attention of WMF legal. Note: It's > > not like the current workflow is completely broken -- the > > Commons:Contact_us flow is actually pretty good -- but a nicer UI and > > more prominent placement could help. The current workflow also does > > not provide an option for consent issues. > > > > * I've summarized the current state of his prototype here: > > > > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Reporting_abuse > > > > On the talk page I've also recommended that consent to be displayed in > > an image be considered in the reporting options. > > > > I'm sure Rillke would appreciate any active development help with the > > feature, as well as continued feedback and encouragement (WikiLove?) > > which is crucial for volunteer motivation. > > > > Cheers, > > Erik > > > > -- > > Erik Möller > > VP of Engineering and Product Development, Wikimedia Foundation > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Gendergap mailing list > > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap > > > > -- > Samuel Klein @metasj w:user:sj +1 617 529 4266 > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap