I think that's a good idea. It's just deciding when...and topics? and what we seek to achieve in these "meetings", unless that's not a necessity.....? The whole IRC meeting concept is rather new to me, so I'm not sure how organized/micromanaged it needs to be.

n00b,

Sarah



On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Brandon Harris <bharris@wikimedia.org> wrote:

       We already have #wikimedia-office for this type of stuff; we could just
use that.

       I think that Ryan has the right of it here.  We can have topical
meetings for a while, and if there is clear and sufficient interest, a
channel could be created.


On 8/19/11 1:36 PM, Ryan Kaldari wrote:
> Rather than just set up a channel and hope that people show up, why
> don't we try a weekly IRC meeting at a specific day and time. I guess
> #wikimedia-gendergap would be the logical channel name (unless someone
> has another idea). Any suggestion for a day and time? Should we log the
> discussion to post elsewhere or keep it "off-the-record"?
>
> Ryan Kaldari
>
> On 8/19/11 12:10 PM, Sarah Stierch wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Fred Bauder <fredbaud@fairpoint.net
>> <mailto:fredbaud@fairpoint.net>> wrote:
>>
>>     Well, it is an excellent opportunity to talk without thinking and get
>>     into trouble, but as I seldom bother with IRC, I would generally be a
>>     no-show. I would go ahead, but unless a regular crew of women
>>     shows up it
>>     will be a bust.
>>
>>
>> Again, the point is to encourage dialogue and partnership with all
>> genders. I'm quite impressed with how diverse IRC actually is. And if
>> you're not participating, then you need not worry ;) It's also another
>> tool for female editors to utilize, and once you show people how to
>> use IRC (I hadn't used it in over 10 years, until yesterday, and all I
>> needed was a little guidance), it's just another place for people to
>> have community.
>>
>> I just think it'd be cool to have a place called home for those of us
>> interested. Just like we have this mailing list (which seems rather
>> male dominated, too!). :)
>>
>> Sarah
>>
>> --
>> GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for the Wikimedia Foundation
>> <http://www.glamwiki.org>
>> Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American Art
>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch>
>> and
>> Sarah Stierch Consulting
>> /Historical, cultural & artistic research & advising./
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> http://www.sarahstierch.com/
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gendergap mailing list
>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap



--
GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for the Wikimedia Foundation
Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American Art
and
Sarah Stierch Consulting
Historical, cultural & artistic research & advising.
------------------------------------------------------
http://www.sarahstierch.com/