Hi Audrey,
What you are describing sounds like a gallery on Wikimedia Commons.
See the following
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Gallerieshttps://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:When_to_create_a_galleryThe Wikipedia article can link to one or more of the galleries on
Wikimedia Commons...
.. and then the Wikipedia article should have a few of the best
and
most relevant images, carefully selected by consensus to balance the
need to be informative (and sometimes a bit confronting) without
resorting to including soft porn in an encyclopedia gratuitously.
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Audrey Cormier <
cormier.home@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> I'm wondering what the thinking is among list members concerning photos
> depicting more militant feminist protest activity.
>
> I've been searching for images on Flickr that relate to feminism worldwide,
> and selecting some to copy to Commons. I've come across a few that are
> definitely in the radical end of the spectrum. The photos themselves range
> from "could be offensive to some people" (e.g. topless demonstrators) to
> "fully intended to be offensive to some/many people" (e.g. anti-male
> graffiti,
posters dealing with menstruation).
>
> Now, it's one thing to discuss militancy in an article, it's another to see
> photos. They have documentary value, and I'm of the mind to go ahead and add
> them to the Radical feminism article. Since they were intended to shock,
> though, I do hesitate to do it.
>
> Would they serve an article well, or detract? Opinions?
>
> Audrey
> (aka OttawaAC)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
>
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap>
--
John Vandenberg