Re " young men from 11-19", which if you think about it, is pretty much the demographic of Wikimedia's admins and functionaries." That's an old joke, but nowadays a joke that looks a tad out of touch. Yes a significant proportion of  people were that age when they became admins in 2004-2008. But if there is one thing we know about the people who became admins ten years ago, it is that they are ten years older today. I couldn't guarantee that none of our current admins were that young now, but I'd be surprised if more than one or two were. Only twenty of our current admins created their accounts in the last six years. RFA has been difficult for teenagers to pass for several years now, If any have got through in the last six years they have been unusually mature in behaviour. As for Functionaries, Functionaries other than crats have to prove they are 18 or over when they become Functionaries. So it is theoretically possible that any new functionaries who first became so in the last two years could be 18 or 19, but it isn't exactly likely.

The template bombers who tag lots of articles for admins to delete probably do include some people in that age group, but admins? If 1% of the 1200 admins on English Wikipedia were still under 21 I would be stunned. Far more admins are over 60 than could possibly be 11-19.



On 20 February 2017 at 18:53, Neotarf <neotarf@gmail.com> wrote:
"A Call to Men UK has 55 coaches working in schools, youth justice departments and youth centres across Worcestershire. The organisation has one principal aim, explains development manager Michael Conroy: to spark a 'cultural shift in the way boys relate to girls', and through this to prevent violence against women and girls....  'As a culture it’s time that we gave our young men permission to be complex, sensitive and happy human beings who transmit positivity and respect to others'.” [1]

They have a program "for young men from 11-19", which if you think about it, is pretty much the demographic of Wikimedia's admins and functionaries. [2] 

This is all the more interesting right now because of the recent Newmark Foundation grant to combat harassment, which it seems is to be used for developing more forceful blocking tools for admins and functionaries "with the participation and support of the volunteers who will be using the tools".  If anyone has not seen the Susan J Fowler / Uber piece on harassment that has started going viral in the last 24 hours, it is here. "...they didn't do anything because the manager who threatened me was a 'high performer.'" [3]  Sound familiar?  This happened in a company with HR oversight; Wikimedia admins and functionaries have no oversight at all.

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap