Hi Deanna,

This is a great question, and something that comes up a lot. There's lots that can be said, but I think the best piece of advice is this: it is NOT prohibited for her to edit her own biography. The "conflict of interest" guideline is just that..a guideline, not policy.

Of course it's a delicate area, and the way she comports herself will have a lot to do with how influential she is. It would probably be a good idea for her to explore Wikipedia editing elsewhere a little before tackling stuff on her own page, to get a feel for how things go.

But if anybody tells her she simply *can't* edit the page, they're flat-out wrong. I would highly recommend she clearly disclose who she is, and put her energy more into removing poorly sourced information (rather than writing original material). Writing original material is not entirely off-limits either, but it's more likely to run into resistance.

Hope this helps. I've done a lot of work in this area, with both people who were successful and others who were not; so please feel free to contact me on- or off-list if you want to discuss further.

-Pete


On May 11, 2011, at 9:58 AM, Deanna Zandt wrote:


Hey all,

Apologies if this isn't the appropriate list/discussion to post to; I learned a lot by following the last BLP discussion, so I'm hoping to get some advice here. It's a question that as a technology consultant I'm asked a lot, and I don't have the greatest answer...

I have a friend & colleague, a popular young NYC feminist, who's got a Wikipedia page. She's often been the subject of multiple troll/flame/stalking/etc wars, online and off, for many years now-- she was a favorite target of Anon and 4chan/b/ at one time, to give you an idea. Her page is rather sparse, but often people swing by and add inflammatory and other negative material to it. Since she's not *that* well known, her page isn't watched/edited by enough people to keep that in check, and she's often left frustrated that this material figures so prominently in her profile.

I told her the best thing for her to do is find people in her community who can add more biographical information and really flesh out her page, so that anything negative has at least more balance to it. Since her community is mostly women, we butt up against the gendergap issue... there just aren't that many women (esp feminists) who are into this work. She's asked on multiple occasions if I or other consultants can be paid edit the page for her, but I advised that this not kosher in the community.

So, she's feeling extremely stuck. She's not supposed to edit her own page, she doesn't have a strong enough community to maintain her page, and she can't pay anyone to do it. What to do? I understand, and she understands, that negativity is just part of the Wikipedia world; but having it be so prominent, and most of it being inflammatory, is just... ugh. So much of her work has been extremely positive and productive, I just hate to see her being recorded in history this way.

Any advice is greatly appreciated.



dz

-=-=-=-=-
Deanna Zandt
Facebook: Personal: http://facebook.com/deannaz

Author: Share This! How You Will Change the World with Social Networking, Berrett-Koehler, June 2010

"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken." -- Oscar Wilde





_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap