As a female I've been called ridiculous for having an opinion so many times I don't even know what it means anymore :-)

But seriously, it's not like the nominator said:"I'm on the GenderGap list and here's why I think this list would agree these articles should be deleted... "

Don't take rejections of AfD nominations so personally...

CM

On 8/26/2012 11:50 AM, Thomas Morton wrote:

On 26 Aug 2012, at 16:36, Carol Moore DC <carolmooredc@verizon.net> wrote:

Questionable just means one has questions. So it's nice, unlike the other words which I was contrasting with questionable - not using to describe my specific questions on specific articles in that particular AfD list. See:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Feminism/Article_alerts

But frankly I do wonder why two people on this list nominate brand new articles related to women for deletion rather than improving them.

HOWEVER -- the specifics should be discussed at the relevant AfD pages, so if this little dust up gets people there, goody goody!! :-)

CM

Wow. What a ridiculous way to say "yes". Ive always found you to be switched on and relevant in the past; but looking over your contributions to those AFDs it feels like your certain the aim is to remove these articles because we are anti-women. And for no other reason.

This is the sort of thing that puts women off editing Wikipedia and I am happy to call it out.

Tom