I agree, i pretty much knew that the ggtf stuff wkuld hitbthe news somewhere.

 

 

 

------ Original message------

From: Carol Moore dc

Date: Thu, Dec 11, 2014 9:01 PM

To: Addressing gender equity and exploring ways to increase the participation of women within Wikimedia projects.;

Subject:Re: [Gendergap] ya'll are in slate

 

On 12/11/2014 6:13 PM, Risker wrote:
> Well, I suppose the Arbitration Committee will now figure out why I 
> thought the case name should be changed.
>
> Risker/Anne
>
The name is accurate.  It was the interactions at GGTF that started the 
hullabaloo.  The Arbitration committee was coming out against it until 
someone brought SPECIFICO's harassment of me to ANI, several GGTF people 
got up to document/complain about it happening at GGTF, and SPECIFICO 
got interaction banned.

At that point Sitush went crazy, screaming about outing and researching 
me, site banning me, writing the bio, which ended up with and Misc for 
Deletion and an ANI.

Suddenly Arbitration comittee decided "GGTF" was important enough.

Like Sitush, did enough Arbitrators think these WOMEN (and their 
supporters) were getting just TOO uppity and getting males in trouble 
for their mere boys will be boys (harassment) behavior?

Remember a couple of them were convinced by some liars that GGTF was 
strongly behind the proposal that a woman's edits only could be reverted 
by TWO male editors?  It took several people with diffs to disabuse them 
of that notion!!!

So this really was very much about GGTF and interactions there.

CM

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap