I responded to the inquiry and replaced all the gendered
pronouns at
issue with singular they. On a related note, I'm very
disappointed to
learn that the Chicago Manual of Style (which provided the
basis for the
original Wikipedia Manual of Style) has stopped recommending
the use of
singular they. As the use of singular they has been steadily
increasing
since the 1960s (Pauwels 2003), it is curious that the Chicago
Manual
would be moving backwards. I have to wonder if there was some
sort of
political pressure involved. On a positive note, the 2011
edition of the
New International Version Bible now uses singular they.
It's an interesting topic, but the original editor seems to
be taking a political stance, which the reverting editor might
not know about. The usage of Generic Antecedents,
by definition require the gender to be unknown or irrelevant.
The traditional usage has been predominantly masculine.
I am not a native English speaker so I might be wrong on
this, but the article is using Generic Antecedents.
The approach taken in English language has certain usage
hard-wired in the brain. There has been a long standing
argument about the political undertone about its usage (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generic_antecedents#Political_opinions).
I'm sure Dominic can correct me if I'm wrong on this one.
Regards
Theo