On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:43, Fred Bauder <
fredbaud@fairpoint.net> wrote:
> I've done this. The link is both degrading and defamatory. Absent
> repeated problems semi-protection is not justified but can be if such
> postings are repeated.
>
> Fred
>
>> Adding semiprotection might help, too.
>> Andreas
>>
>> --- On Wed, 31/8/11, Sarah <
slimvirgin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Sarah <
slimvirgin@gmail.com>
>> Subject: [Gendergap] Oversight request
>> To: "Increasing female participation in Wikimedia projects"
>> <
gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org>
>> Date: Wednesday, 31 August, 2011, 17:23
>>
>> If there are oversighters on this list (Fred?), I'd appreciate an
>> oversight at [[Jessica Valenti], where an anon (58.175.246.206) has
>> linked to an attack site about her.
>>
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jessica_Valenti&action=history
>>
>> I've edited the article a lot myself so I'd prefer not to admin-delete
>> it, and oversight would be better anyway. I've emailed the oversight
>> team, but no response yet.
>>
>> Sarah
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gendergap mailing list
>>
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gendergap mailing list
>>
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
>
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap