On topic, are we going to see some more debate about the Slate piece? Anne/Risker is suggesting there was a basic misunderstanding on the part of the author: that the whole thing had nothing to do with gender gap discrimination but behavior. Would that be your view, Molly? It does strike me as insular.
In my view, the case centered on the behavior of a number of contributors, largely (but not solely) at he Gender Gap Task Force. I would like to think the rename to “Interactions at the GGTF” would clarify that the case was about the interactions and not the task force, but I realize the difference is perhaps too subtle.
– Molly (not a pseudonym)