Are we seriously suggesting that women, as a class, are not editing Wikipedia because sometimes editors use naughty words? <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Brandon Harris <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:bharris@wikimedia.org">bharris@wikimedia.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
        &quot;Jerk&quot; would serve the exact sentiment.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
<br>
On 3/13/11 10:21 AM, Fred Bauder wrote:<br>
<br>
&gt; Feel free to suggest a new title and revise the article accordingly.<br>
&gt; We&#39;ve used that expression for a long time, but I don&#39;t think there is<br>
&gt; any good reason to not change it. However, the title needs to be both<br>
&gt; descriptive and memorable<br>
<br>
</div><div><div></div><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
Gendergap mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org">Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap" target="_blank">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>