>Wow,
did everybody here just blame the victim? “If you had done x this wouldn't have
happened.” No. This is exactly the point that keeps women from participating in
everything, incluiding being visible in Wikipedia and talking openly about their
interests!
>It was inappropriate of the guy to stalk you and inappropriate of the
church to confirm your number without your consent. It's not inappropriate to be
visible as a woman!
I should add that such stalking is not limited to women. I don’t deny it’s
more likely, but I have been stalked as well. The acolytes of a notable banned
user, a film producer who had at that point long been trying through a variety
of ways, mostly disruptive, to get the article on himself deleted, tried to come
after me when not only did I block one of his socks, I traced the IP to a
prominent production company and referred his misuse of their network to
security there, which apparently took it seriously (at the time, it would never
have occurred to me that someone would constantly add material to an article
about themselves accusing themselves of child molestation as a way (they
thought) of getting the article deleted) ... I really thought I was being
helpful).
Needless to say, he took umbrage at my going above and beyond our usual
procedures (not usual for me, however ... I believe any egregious misuse of an
entity’s computer systems to maliciously edit Wikipedia, use that usually
violates terms of service, should be reported to the responsible personnel at
those entities, and there are students at school districts throughout the US and
Canada who’ve been disciplined as a result of reports I’ve made to the
appropriate administrators). He complained about this on a forum thread at his
website, and one of his acolytes apparently took it on himself to post a version
of my home address (easily findable online since I use my real name and the
region I live in on my userpage, and in any event a close examination of my
edits would probably narrow down the community I live in, since I have heavily
edited and expanded the article, and it remains on my watchlist) that was
just incorrect enough to not be findable on Google. That person, or another,
created a username with that address and, using it, inserted themselves into a
talk-page discussion I was participating in. I later blocked the account and
redacted the edits from the page. I can’t say I wasn’t a little unnerved by all
this.
Daniel Case
P.S. I do think the real failure here was the church. They just gave out
your phone number to some stranger who called? Without any apparent need for
said stranger to use any [[social engineering]] skills? I would bring this up
with the board of trustees or elders or whatever ... especially with this
incident already having occurred, the church has serious liability exposure if
it doesn’t make any policy changes before, say, this happens in the case of a
stalker with much more malevolent intentions.