And as a note - when you review the content that users are uploading using Bryan's bot, the MAJORITY of it is educational content. Nothing "questionable" or too contorversial.

It seems the biggest problems come from a freedom of panorama, nudity/porn, and celebrity images uploaded to Flickr with incorrect permissions/not the users work/copyright infringement/blahbalhblah. It does appear that there are some users that just upload every bit of free content they can find outside of family photos.

Like Commons, anyone can upload it, but, unlike Commons, no one on Flickr reviews content for appropriateness and copyright correctness.  I suppose we are one step ahead, it's just irritating when you come across an image's source and this is what you get:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/22186088@N03/4038072177/

Sarah


On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Chris Keating <chriskeatingwiki@gmail.com> wrote:

> Especially when the images are scraped off the CC-BY and CC-BY-SA Flickr
> streams.
>
That was something I noticed the other day. An anon replaced the
infobox image on Veganism with a close-up shot of a woman's genitals
and a vibrator. I looked to see who had uploaded it and it said Flickr
upload bot. So is there a bot that uploads all cc images from Flickr
indiscriminately?


Apparently a bot does the work, but a human has to ask for them.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Flickr_upload_bot

Chris 

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap




--
GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for Wikimedia
Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American Art
and
Sarah Stierch Consulting
Historical, cultural & artistic research & advising.
------------------------------------------------------
http://www.sarahstierch.com/