Hi Kathleen,I suppose you are writing about this revision (or thereabouts):A notability tag is not a "Scarlet A": it is merely a sign that the notability of the topic hasn't been sufficiently asserted.The best way to avoid it?Choose multiple, clear, independent sources.Check the subject-specific notability guidelines. For books, for instance:Given a revision with two sources, one from a little-known site called "we love this book", it's unsurprising! Remember that editors come from all backgrounds and we don't all know as much as/the same things as you!I've thought a lot about notability, as a researcher, so if you want to talk more about it, let me know!-JodiOn Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Kathleen McCook <klmccook@gmail.com> wrote:The reason I asked to discuss here is to ascertain whether or not there seems to be a different set of notability standards by gender.I encourage students to contribute to Wikipedia.But when notability is an editor's decision with so many exceptions...how do you encourage?Really, I am careful and if a book by a brilliant woman like Zoe Wicomb causes notability queries..how, on earth, can this gender gap be addressed?Here is Ms. Wicomb's prize announcement at Yale.On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Pete Forsyth <peteforsyth@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Daniel and Elizabeth Case <dancase@frontiernet.net> wrote:
That he’s a regular denizen of the bestseller lists in many countries who’s had works adapted into major motion pictures (To be honest, I think we should say that “all published works by authors who have their paperbacks displayed prominently in the racks near the front of bookstores at airports are notable “).On what basis in Clive Cussler notable?Well, I don't know. I had never heard of Cussler before today (don't spend a lot of time in airport bookshops), but I did look at a couple of his novels' Wikipedia articles, and they didn't indicate significance any better than the October article. (One of them had a single, ephemeral reference; the other had 7 that seemed pretty thin.)I can see how Kathleen would be frustrated by what surely appears from her perspective to be a double standard.Pete[[User:Peteforsyth]]
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap