Well, what I'd like to say is that some of these arguments do make sense. While men shouldn't get over-sensitive over perceived "harassment" of them, neither should women just whine about harassment.--Eat me, I'm an azuki
At 2015-10-04 01:29:33, "Carol Moore dc" <carolmooredc@verizon.net> wrote:
>The relevance is that some wikipedia editors would like to shut us all
>up about harassment and civility and have made or will increase making
>these kinds of arguments...
>
>Already made:
>"I'm a serious contributor with 100 contributions a day and I shouldn't
>have to put up with petty nonsense about civility and harassment."
>
>"These women are just oversensitive and have to "man up" and take it."
>
>New variations could be made:
>
>"I'm scared of making my 100 contributions a day cause I might get
>accused of harassment if there are any women on that article."
>
>"These women and their false accusations are scaring away dozens of top
>contributors..." etc.
>
>"I hope the women editing here won't start screaming harassment and
>start scaring away big contributors who put so much important material
>in the encyclopedia."
>
>"This woman complaining about harassment at ANI is just part of a pack
>of feminists world wide who are scaring men so badly they are hurting
>themselves and wikipedia..."
>
>etc.
>
>On 10/3/2015 11:19 AM, Daniel and Elizabeth Case wrote:
>>> From having looked only at the headlines:
>>
>> 1) I really don't see the direct relevance of these to this list.
>>
>> 2) Consider the sources: a British newspaper so notorious for its
>> sympathies to the Conservative Party and its associated politics that
>> it's known informally as the Torygraph, and an American tabloid owned by
>> Rupert Murdoch and known for similar politics.
>>
>> Daniel Case
>
>_______________________________________________
>Gendergap mailing list
>Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
>To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
>https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap