This seems reasonable to me, though I&#39;m a little wary of drawing the line so firmly just in case there&#39;s a case I&#39;m not thinking of where sexual image would best illustrate something on a non-sexual page.<br><br>

-Fluff<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Ryan Kaldari <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:rkaldari@wikimedia.org">rkaldari@wikimedia.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">




  

<div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Yep, try
<a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:People_using_vacuum_cleaners" target="_blank">http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:People_using_vacuum_cleaners</a><br>
<br>
So do we all agree that the Principle of Least Astonishment needs to be
encoded into some kind of policy or guideline? In other words, images
with a sexual context should only appear in articles/categories that
also have a sexual context. <br>
<br>
Ryan Kaldari<br></div></blockquote></div>