Thanks for your reply, Joseph - fair enough! :) I agree with you - I
think there have been some major lapses of assumption of good faith
from both (all?) sides.
(Ouch looking back at my post, I'm wishing I could hit edit. The edit
summary would be something along the lines of "typo fixing".)
On 4/29/13, Joseph Reagle <joseph.2011(a)reagle.org> wrote:
On 04/29/2013 10:03 PM, Lady of Shalott wrote:
Interesting commentary as far as it went. I wish
he'd delved a little
further into what he was saying.
...
Just thinking out loud here...
I'm actually on this list :) and was just thinking out loud as well to
see if I could understand the incident since I was seeing pretty strong
claims (both "Wikipedia is sexist" and "this is journalism run
amok.")
For instance, people continue to report that Filipacchi is a reporter
for NYT when these were op-eds.