If BBW failed to confirm that photos with nametags were OK with any of those they depicted, yes, that would be a problem. I'm confident they would want to know about that, and I'd be happy to pass that feedback along if it hasn't already been delivered.

But is there any reason to believe that happened?

Pete

[[User:Peteforsyth]]

On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 9:39 AM, J Hayes <slowking4@gmail.com> wrote:

yes and some time  dilation

and taking pictures of people with user name tags on, so outing

On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Pete Forsyth <peteforsyth@gmail.com> wrote:

This feature article from Bloomberg BusinessWeek does, IMO, a great job of exploring and contextualizing Wikipedia's diversity issues. The reporters really did their homework on this one, taking the time to explore all angles.

There are certainly a few factual errors, the most egregious are probably the confusing between policy and guideline on paid editing, and the conflation of Wikipedia and WMF in a couple places.

Thoughts?

Is Wikipedia Woke?
The ubiquitous reference site tries to expand its editor ranks beyond the Comic Con set.
by Dimitra Kessenides and Max Chafkin
December 22, 2016

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2016-12-22/how-woke-is-wikipedia-s-editorial-pool

-Pete
--

[[User:Peteforsyth]]

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap