And nobody, of course, addresses the class issue: that Filipacchi is a privileged scion of one of the largest global publishing companies, and is not accustomed to having her own self-interest questioned in a classic WP:BOOMERANG fashion by vulgar Wikipedians nobody who MATTERS ever heard of.On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Joseph Reagle <joseph.2011@reagle.org> wrote:
On 04/29/2013 10:03 PM, Lady of Shalott wrote:
Interesting commentary as far as it went. I wish he'd delved a little...
further into what he was saying.
Just thinking out loud here...
I'm actually on this list :) and was just thinking out loud as well to see if I could understand the incident since I was seeing pretty strong claims (both "Wikipedia is sexist" and "this is journalism run amok.") For instance, people continue to report that Filipacchi is a reporter for NYT when these were op-eds.
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
--
Michael J. "Orange Mike" Lowrey
"When I get a little money I buy books; and if any is left, I buy food and clothes."
-- Desiderius Erasmus
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap