GW, accusing me of hijacking this list for a "vendetta" is a purely untrue and petty accusation. For the last couple of years my goal on the project has been to make it more fair for all editors regardless of status (admin or editor), gender, race, etc. I have been aware, for quite a while, that there are multiple levels of abuse and bias on the project but perhaps you were too busy ignoring my statements and protecting your peers than to recognize that. Yes, I was pissed when I was banned and still am. But I got the review that I asked for and the result of that review was a fair one even though I did not agree with it. Whether you agree with me or not, there are serious problems in Wikipedia with regard to civility and with regard to admins and some editors being exempt from the rules.
With that said, of the 2 of us, which one is responsible for participating in banning Carol, participating in setting in motion the series of events that have lead not only many discussion on this list but on Wikipediocracy and now news articles as well? Here's a hint, its not me.
The bottom line is, if the Arbcom made better decisions and did a better job of making decisions based on whats best for Wikiepdia and not whats best for them, we probably wouldn't be in the situation we are in now. So if you are coming here to try and discredit me, you might want to take a look at your own actions first.