http://toolserver.org/~magnus/glamorous.php?doit=Do+it!&category=Nude+portrayals+of+computer+technology should answer George's question. It takes a while loading and it isn't worksafe - unless you can get away with thumbnails-Ole.
http://palnatoke.org * @palnatoke * +4522934588On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 1:10 AM, George Herbert <george.herbert@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm at work and can't really get away with looking at the gallery images from here without trouble. However...Has anyone looked at them to see where (if anywhere) they are in use on projects?-george--On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Nathan <nawrich@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm sure EVula knew that Commoners wouldn't abide his deletion of
their fap galleries. They've never liked it much before, and this
gallery is even nerdy! Double whammy. The uploader freaked out with
inspiring rapidity.
The arguments given in a previous deletion review are instructive;
only the most mechanical reading of the project scope policy, in the
way most charitable to retaining pornographic collections, were even
considered. The closer said, paraphrasing: "Pornographic? Sure, don't
care. Objectifies women? Sure, don't care. Not useful on another
Wikimedia project? Sure, don't care. It was on Flickr, so they must
have consented to publication on Commons, case closed."
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
-george william herbert
george.herbert@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
--
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
