At a minimum I would expect SuSa and/or Arbcom to conduct some meaningful investigation if there was an allegation of a functionary's trustworthiness. Perhaps (and I'm only speculating here) Arbcom and SuSa were unable to find enough hard evidence to support the allegation which is why nothing was done. I would suggest taking this matter up with Susa and Arbcom directly; perhaps they will be able to explain what they did (if anything) and what their findings were (if any). I'd understand if an investigation was done but they couldn't find enough evidence to support a revocation of functionary permissions; what would concern me more is if the matter was brought to their attention and they didn't investigate it at all.

Pine

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 6:19 AM, J Hayes <slowking4@gmail.com> wrote:

nope -
this was an incident at wikiconUSA 2015

apparently nothing done

which has impacted the credibility of arbcom and susa

(i was not witness, but i find the complainants credible)

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:54 PM, Pine W <wiki.pine@gmail.com> wrote:

I'm unfamiliar with this situation, but if there's a functionary whose off-wiki behavior calls into question of the appropriateness of his/her continuing

to have access to PII, please do forward that information to SuSa, the Ombudsman Committee, and/or (as applicable) the local arbitration committee
that would have the ability to investigate the situation.

Pine

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:29 PM, J Hayes <slowking4@gmail.com> wrote:

yes, that functionary and his behavior on meta has chilled the participation of some librarian editors

they are highly skeptical of wiki harrassment efforts as long as he is in a position to see personal identifying information.

they do not trust check user to be done responsibly as well

this is impacting our efforts to engage a GLAM institution.

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Neotarf <neotarf@gmail.com> wrote:

Speaking of dox and in-person events, a few months ago one of the
WP:BADSITES known for dox had a thread about attending a WMF
harassment workshop. So anyone who is not comfortable with a paper
trail, and would prefer face-to-face conversations with allies, could
actually find themselves face to face with their harassers instead.

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap