On 7/27/2014 3:07 PM, Pine W wrote:

That discussion seems to have fragmented badly away from the original topic of a civility board, and I'm not sure that listing grievances, even legitimate ones, is likely to produce any good outcomes in that discussion. Might be better to start a new discussion with a narrow focus and specific proposals for change.

Pine

Probably anything less than a proposal worked over and signed on to by 20 editors on this topic would get derailed by those who just want to do their thing with out "mother" watching over the shoulder - or whatever.

One of the items I put under suggestions on the talk page of the Gender Gap Task force agenda is "thinking up policy tweaks and changes, like regarding WP:Civility and WP:Harassment, to make Wikipedia more comfortable for women." It probably would be best to start a discussion of solutions there, including some ideas that came up here in the last week.

We're still building infrastructure, so come on by!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Countering_systemic_bias/Gender_gap_task_force

On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Carol Moore dc <carolmooredc@verizon.net> wrote:

It ranges all over the place on various issues.

Wikipedia_talk:Administrators'_noticeboard#Where_and_how_to_request_a_Civility_board

I'm now trying to use it for a definitive ruling as to whether the Gender Gap task force main page/subpage/essay can list particularly obnoxious examples of sexism, like a number that were mentioned here over the time.

Pandora's box is being opened?

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap