Did you investigate the ref? Is it unbiased?

Did you revert the change to remove sectioning? That seems obviously improper to me, assuming the length of the section is what it should be for the import of the topic.

Powers &8^]

-----Original Message-----
From: Carol Moore dc [mailto:carolmooredc@verizon.net]
Sent: Sunday 4 August 2013 08:55
To: Increasing female participation in Wikimedia projects
Subject: [Gendergap] Multiple sexual assault allegations a "public imageproblem"

I happened to notice last night that the Bill Clinton article had "Allegation for sexual assault" as a subsection of "Public image".

Thinking it's a bit more than than that, I just moved it up to a full section.

Within a few hours an editor completely removed any sectioning, leaving it under public image.

And another editor with a male user name started complaining about how some ref was evidence of a big smear against Bill Clinton.

I'm not going to fight about it, but it's a reminder of the true status of women and their concerns on Wikipedia... sigh...

CM