[snip]
It make no real difference what it is called, guideline or policy, as long as everyone one is singing from the same page in the hymnal. The deletion discussion over the past week, (and there have been many of them using lack of model consent as reason) have gone well. Friendly, with no conduct issues that I can see. No extreme hyperbole. Largely people are discussing the images by citing policy, and admins are closing them with consensus.
It make no real difference what it is called, guideline or policy, as long as everyone one is singing from the same page in the hymnal. The deletion discussion over the past week, (and there have been many of them using lack of model consent as reason) have gone well. Friendly, with no conduct issues that I can see. No extreme hyperbole. Largely people are discussing the images by citing policy, and admins are closing them with consensus.On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Ryan Kaldari <rkaldari@wikimedia.org> wrote:On 9/13/11 8:03 PM, Sarah Stierch wrote:There aren't any categories currently, but I could add some. Right now,
> I think this is really great, thank you Kaldari for taking the time to
> create this.
>
> The n00b in me asks :
>
> 1) Is this trackable? That is, a hidden category or anything?
you can view all the images it is used on at
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Consent
Right now there is no actual policy as far as I know, just a guideline
> 2) I think we should solidify the policy documentation (i.e. the
> recent board passing, etc), and complete that work before we promote
> this template.
and a resolution. Getting something encoded as policy might be a good
goal to work towards.
Ryan Kaldari
I know that there has been division about this in the past, but if people use the consent template as you have written it, I think that everything will be fine.
Sydney
User:FloNight
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap