Okay, so the main problem is double-standard in which women speaking up against perceived harassment is considered incivil. I'd just like to say that there is a difference between a legitimate whistle blower and a whiny little mushroom.--Eat me, I'm an azuki
At 2015-10-06 02:42:56, "Carol Moore dc" <carolmooredc@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>
>On 10/4/2015 5:59 AM, Robert Williams wrote:
>> Well, what I'd like to say is that some of these arguments do make
>> sense. While men shouldn't get over-sensitive over perceived
>> "harassment" of them, neither should women just whine about
>> harassment.--Eat me, I'm an azuki
>
>The problem is is the double standard where women's actions are more
>easily perceived as uncivil and/or harassment and their complaints about
>incivility/harassment are labeled whining or even harassment.
>
>I got banned from Wikipedia for merely defending myself against constant
>harassment on the Gender Gap talk page and losing my temper a few times
>in Arbitration because of the massive harassment there by people I
>didn't even know.
>
>The guy who got Ibanned from me for harassment got NO other warning or
>sanction about it during arbitration. The guy who started a harassing
>article about me only got a warning.
>
>Only two of the several guys who worked together to harass and sabotage
>the talk page got warnings about it.
>
>By the way, "eat me, I'm an azuki" doesn't sound like a friendly
>message. Must I really do an internet search of the meaning of the term
>azuki?
>
>_______________________________________________
>Gendergap mailing list
>Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
>To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
>https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap